The lunch break time is often a source of heated disagreement for many. Whilst for some companies, it is one hour, others have half-hour lunch policy, and for the unlucky few, it may mean eating and working at the same time. Still, what matters here is that how long is optimum to benefit both the company and the individual worker?
Commonly, the lunch break time varies by the business nature and the arrangements in place within the organization. For instance, smaller businesses mayn’t have enough employees to cover lengthy lunches, so will opt for shorter ones. Some employees working in flexible time may lunch shorter in favor for leaving the workplace earlier.
THE ONE-HOUR LUNCH BREAK
Many companies believe that an hour for lunch is good for both the business and the employee. By taking such a long break to eat lunch, even leave the workplace to go for a walk, do some shopping, etc., it will leave the worker recharged and raring to go again. Some people even argue that when employees take an hour for lunch, they are more likely to make healthy food choices as they have more time to devote to it. This can help boost energy levels and raise work productivity. Because many businesses don’t pay their workers for their lunch hour, it makes sense to take the break and not be guilty about it.
THE HALF-HOUR LUNCH BREAK
Other companies argue that half an hour is enough to devote to lunch. Some workers may value this arrangement, too because they can leave the workplace half an hour earlier, or take two small rests in the morning or afternoon. In some workplace environments where there are no other shops, facilities, etc, nearby, there may not be enough to occupy an hour.
Still, the disadvantage of shorter lunch breaks is that employees may tend to eat at their desks. This will make it more difficult to switch off from work and work-related distractions, and may decrease productivity later in the afternoon. Workers need to take time away from desk to reenergize themselves, but this is less likely to happen with such a short lunch break. Another downside is that when being given to shorter breaks, workers may choose less healthy food options – for example, fast food, instant sugar boosts, which won’t sustain their energy levels throughout the rest of workday.
SO, HOW LONG SHOULD THE LUNCH BREAK BE?
Commonly, the lunch break time varies by the business nature and the arrangements in place within the organization. For instance, smaller businesses mayn’t have enough employees to cover lengthy lunches, so will opt for shorter ones. Some employees working in flexible time may lunch shorter in favor for leaving the workplace earlier.
THE ONE-HOUR LUNCH BREAK
Many companies believe that an hour for lunch is good for both the business and the employee. By taking such a long break to eat lunch, even leave the workplace to go for a walk, do some shopping, etc., it will leave the worker recharged and raring to go again. Some people even argue that when employees take an hour for lunch, they are more likely to make healthy food choices as they have more time to devote to it. This can help boost energy levels and raise work productivity. Because many businesses don’t pay their workers for their lunch hour, it makes sense to take the break and not be guilty about it.
THE HALF-HOUR LUNCH BREAK
Other companies argue that half an hour is enough to devote to lunch. Some workers may value this arrangement, too because they can leave the workplace half an hour earlier, or take two small rests in the morning or afternoon. In some workplace environments where there are no other shops, facilities, etc, nearby, there may not be enough to occupy an hour.
Still, the disadvantage of shorter lunch breaks is that employees may tend to eat at their desks. This will make it more difficult to switch off from work and work-related distractions, and may decrease productivity later in the afternoon. Workers need to take time away from desk to reenergize themselves, but this is less likely to happen with such a short lunch break. Another downside is that when being given to shorter breaks, workers may choose less healthy food options – for example, fast food, instant sugar boosts, which won’t sustain their energy levels throughout the rest of workday.
SO, HOW LONG SHOULD THE LUNCH BREAK BE?
Lunch Breaks at Work: How long is enough?
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire